CHUUK STATE SUPREME COURT TRIAL DIVISION
Cite as In re Estate of Manas, 15 FSM Intrm. 609 (Ch. S. Ct. Tr. 2008)
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF
JOEL MANAS,
Deceased,
By: Santina Sos,
Petitioner.
CSSC PROBATE NO. 04-2008
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS
Keske S. Marar
Associate Justice
Hearing: May 1, 2008
Decided: May 6, 2008
APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioner: George Hauk
P.O. Box 1405
Weno, Chuuk FM 96942
For the Claimant: Fredrick A. Hartman
(Cherita Manas) P.O. Box 453
Weno, Chuuk FM 96942
* * * *
When it was established that a decedent's real property at issue was lineage land, it continues to be property of the lineage, and is not part of the decedent's estate. In re Estate of Manas, 15 FSM Intrm. 609, 611 (Chk. S. Ct. Tr. 2008).
Title to land is not generally subject to probate but transfers pursuant to a valid will to the devisees specified in the will, or if there is no valid will, to the owner's heirs according to intestate succession. In re Estate of Manas, 15 FSM Intrm. 609, 611 (Chk. S. Ct. Tr. 2008).
Social security benefits are not subject to probate, as the Social Security Board, not the court, has initial jurisdiction over applications for social security benefits, whether by a surviving spouse or surviving children. The procedure for such applications is set forth in the Social Security Act. In re Estate of Manas, 15 FSM Intrm. 609, 611 (Chk. S. Ct. Tr. 2008).
Only if a life insurance policy has no designated or named beneficiary, would the policy benefits be payable to a decedent's estate to be distributed through probate to his heirs or devisees. In re Estate of Manas, 15 FSM Intrm. 609, 611 (Chk. S. Ct. Tr. 2008).
When the decedent's life insurance policy named his mother, who predeceased the decedent, as beneficiary, the rights in the policy became part of her estate when she died and descended to the devisees according to her will, if she had one, or her heirs according to the law of intestate succession, if she had no will. In re Estate of Manas, 15 FSM Intrm. 609, 611 (Chk. S. Ct. Tr. 2008).
* * * *
KESKE S. MARAR, Associate Justice:
On February 7, 2007, decedent Joel Manas died intestate. On February 12, 2008, petitioner Santina Sos, decedent's surviving spouse, filed her petition for appointment as administratrix of the
estate of Joel Manas. A radio announcement regarding the petition was made the same day. On March 12, 2008, Cherita Manas, on behalf of herself and her sister Randa Manas filed a response to the petition, stating they and not Santina Sos are the rightful heirs to their father's estate. On May 1, 2008, the court held a proceeding on the matter and took the issue of the probate of the decedent's estate under advisement.
At trial, it was established that the decedent's real property at issue was lineage land, which continues to be property of the lineage, and not part of his estate. Even if it were not lineage land, title to land is not generally subject to probate, but transfers pursuant to a valid will to the devisees specified in the will, or if there is no valid will, to the owner's heirs, according to intestate succession. See George v. Abraham, 14 FSM Intrm. 102, 106 (Kos. S. Ct. Tr. 2006).
Decedent's social security benefits are also not subject to probate, as the Social Security Board, not the court, has initial jurisdiction over applications for social security benefits. Whether by a surviving spouse or surviving children, the procedure for such applications is set forth in the Social Security Act. See 73 TTC 101 et seq. Therefore, the court will make no determination regarding rights to decedent's social security benefits.
Decedent's life insurance policy was also placed in issue. Only if a life insurance policy has no designated or named beneficiary, would the policy benefits be payable to his estate to be distributed through probate to his heirs or devisees. John v. Chuuk Public Utility Corp., 15 FSM Intrm. 169, 171 (Chk. 2007). In this case, it was established that decedent's life insurance policy named his mother, Rose Manas, who predeceased decedent, as beneficiary. When she died, the rights in the policy became part of her estate and descended to the devisees according to her will, if she had one, or her heirs according to the law of intestate succession, if she had no will.
Consequently, before the court may make any determination as to the rights in the life insurance policy, the court requires additional information regarding decedent's mothers' devisees or heirs.
It is therefore ordered that any interested person may submit, within fourteen days of the date of this order, evidence regarding the rightful heirs or devisees of decedent's mother. The parties are also invited to submit any briefing on how the laws of intestate succession should operate, by custom or otherwise, in this case. Upon the submission of such evidence and briefing, the court will make its final determination as to rights to decedent's life insurance policy. The court also reserves ruling on petitioner's request to be appointed as administratrix until the determination on the life insurance policy is made.
* * * *